<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Xblog: Shouting "Nuke!" In a Crowded Theatre</title>
    <link>http://xblog.xman.org/articles/2008/01/28/shouting-nuke-in-a-crowded-theatre</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>hey, if it has a capital X in it, it has to be great!</description>
    <item>
      <title>Shouting &amp;quot;Nuke!&amp;quot; In a Crowded Theatre</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Two interesting takes on how to deal with threats. Folks at the University of Purdue want to equip &lt;a href="http://news.uns.purdue.edu/x/2008a/080122FischbachNuclear.html"&gt;every cell phone with a what is effectively a Geiger counter&lt;/a&gt;. Think of it as &amp;#8220;security through ubiquity&amp;#8221;. Meanwhile the NYPD wants to &lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0803,thompson,78873,2.html"&gt;carefully restrict the distribution of Geiger counters and related devices&lt;/a&gt; because of fears of problems with false alarms and such.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I think there is wisdom in both approaches. Probably the sanest thing is to have sensors everywhere and to learn not to overreact to false positives&amp;#8230;. &lt;a href="http://xblog.xman.org/articles/2007/09/21/boston-neo-luddite-hot-spot"&gt;only people aren&amp;#8217;t so good at that last part&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:31:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:b12d5b95-2635-4a89-95b4-7fe62cf9229c</guid>
      <author>Christopher Smith</author>
      <link>http://xblog.xman.org/articles/2008/01/28/shouting-nuke-in-a-crowded-theatre</link>
      <category>Security</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
